Editorial policy

Our coverage should be clear about what is known, what is interpretation and where a stadium question has more than one reasonable answer.

Accuracy and context

We check factual claims against suitable material and take care with dates, terminology and descriptions of design. Comparisons should make their basis clear; a general account is not a substitute for current venue information. We do not present speculation as established fact.

Independence and interests

Editorial choices are made for reader interest, not to disguise promotion. Relevant interests are disclosed where they could affect how a piece is understood. Partner or sponsored material is clearly labelled and kept distinct from independent editorial coverage.

Corrections and illustrations

If a factual error is identified, we review it and correct the article where appropriate, making significant changes clear to readers. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; when used, they are identified as illustrative rather than documentary images.